Federal Judge Declines to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Poland Spring Water Claims

By Garry

Federal Judge Declines to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Poland Spring Water Claims

Federal Judge Declines to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Poland Spring Water Claims

A federal judge in Connecticut has refused to dismiss a long-running lawsuit accusing the former Nestle Waters North America of misleading consumers by labeling its Poland Spring bottled water as “spring water.”

The lawsuit raises questions about whether Poland Spring bottled water meets the legal definition of “spring water” under the laws of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Meyer in New Haven called this an “open question.”

Allegations by Plaintiffs

The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in 2017, alleging that:

Defense Arguments

The defense, representing the company now known as Primo Brands, argued that:

Judge’s Ruling

Judge Meyer:

  • Allowed Some Claims to Proceed: While dismissing some parts of the lawsuit, the judge permitted others to continue.
  • Rejected Label Change Demands: He ruled that plaintiffs, now aware of the alleged issues, could avoid purchasing the brand, thus lacking standing to demand new labels.
Expert Testimony

A former Syracuse University earth sciences professor, hired by the plaintiffs, testified that:

Corporate Developments
Future Implications

The lawsuit could set an industry precedent for the labeling and marketing of bottled water, especially regarding the definition of “spring water” under FDA and state regulations.

The case continues under the title Patane v. Nestle Waters North America Inc in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.

Leave a Comment

Exit mobile version